Fw: Re: [Aleph] OpenType-to-TeX and other musings...
Idris Samawi Hamid
ishamid at colostate.edu
Fri Dec 23 20:18:57 CET 2005
Hi Hans
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 02:22:20 -0700, Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:
>> 3. We still need to support the 16-bit level-0 ovf fonts. Even with
>> opentype, a large virtual font format is needed and ovf's perform
>> excellently in my experience (though some of the utilities are buggy).
>> In any case, I hope it's not too much to ask that pdfetex++ support
>> the old ovf's lying around...
>
> what makes those ovf fonts unique? can't they be replaced by open type
> variants?
1. Remember, we still have large CID PS fonts, not to mention regular ps
fonts which need to be concatenated into one (large) encoding. Of course,
one could use FontForge etc. to merge ps type 1 fonts, but it would still
be nice to be able to create and use large virtual fonts from multiple
other fonts, even open type fonts. Besides, dvips and dvipdfmx already
support it, so no work needed there. It's a well-working format as far as
my experience goes.
OpenType does not necessarily make virtual fonts obsolete, does it?
Best
Idris
--
Professor Idris Samawi Hamid
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
More information about the Aleph
mailing list