[dev-context] Re: [NTG-context] font problems again

[Hans Hagen]

Adam Lindsay wrote:

>[changed to dev-context]
>Hans Hagen said this at Mon, 14 Nov 2005 00:07:44 +0100:
>
>  
>
>>lucida is a special case -)
>>
>>because i used lucida a lot, those definitions ended up in the core, but 
>>when i bought more and more fonts, i finally decided to move the lucida 
>>defs to the type-buy.tex typescript because that;s where they belong
>>
>>you can add the line:
>>
>> \usetypescriptfile[type-buy]
>>
>>to the cont-sys.tex file, but best is (because it's a document property) 
>>to say in you document (or style):
>>
>>\usetypescriptfile[type-buy]         % loads commercial font definitions
>>\usetypescript[lucida][texnansi]   % defines a lucida typeface
>>\setupbodyfont[lucida,12pt]         % enables the  typeface  defined as 
>>'lucida'
>>    
>>
>
>That reminds me, Hans. The PCTeX edition of Lucida are floating around.
>I've done some preliminary typescripts, and they seem to fit in well. I
>need to track down some issues with obscure math characters (making them
>match CM math), figuring out if the discrepancy is in the current math-
>lbr definitions, or in changes with the new fonts. 
>
>Other than that, what should the definitions be called?  
> \starttypescript[lucidanew]?
> doing an override in type-dis?
>  
>

is this the b&h lucida?

we can go for lucida-nova (as with optima-nova and palatino-nova -)

Hans