[dev-context] TLContrib is ready for testing

Mojca Miklavec mojca.miklavec.lists at gmail.com
Wed Oct 6 13:19:01 CEST 2010


On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 13:15, Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:
> On 6-10-2010 1:00, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>>> Should we ask Dick to fix texmfcnf.lua to handle both
>>> old and new ConTeXt? But most important of all - why doesn't ConTeXt
>
> in what respect old and new? mkii does not use that file

Not MKII, but old meaning "MKIV before March 2010" that was using a
different format of texmfcnf.lua.

>>> handle that already? (Why doesn't it find several versions of
>>> configuration file and just overloads the important bits?)
>
> afaik you can have several texmfcnf.lua files
>
> mtxrun  texmfcnf.lua
>
> reports what it will load (two files on my machine as I have to add dev
> paths/trees)

Well, on my machine (after updating ConTeXt from Taco's repository) it reports:

> mtxrun texmfcnf.lua

MTXrun | unknown script 'mtx-base.lua' or 'mtx-mtx-base.lua'

Mojca


More information about the dev-context mailing list