[Dev-luatex] 0.60.2 fails to build on armel in CXXLD.sh
taco at elvenkind.com
Mon Dec 20 14:21:05 CET 2010
Can you have a look at the CXXLD.sgh issue reported below?
The bug that is referred to is here:
and reading that will (hopefully) explain enough of the missing
quotations from the email exchange below.
On 12/20/2010 02:13 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 02:41 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> On 12/20/2010 01:18 PM, Jani Monoses wrote:
>>> luatex fails to build on Ubuntu Natty
>> Note that the current luatex is 0.65.0 (but it is unlikely
>> that that makes any difference).
>>> Why is a static link needed btw? Does --disable-runtime-cxx-hack
>>> have some drawbacks?
>> Luatex is normally built as part of texlive, and the texlive
>> distribution contains precompiled binaries for various platforms.
>> libc++ and the gcc libraries are linked statically to make the
>> generated binaries more portable, so no, for a local binary
>> you can disable the hack.
> ok, thanks.
> According to a gcc involved commenter on the bugreport I linked to,
> the CXXLD.sh generation itself is incorrect, as he could fix the build
> by omitting some of the flags.
> So that still may be a luatex specific issue.
>> However, I cannot guarantee that that fixes the problem. If a
>> symbol cannot be found using static linking, I do not have a lot
>> of faith in the runtime system being able to find it. You may
>> have to define -fno-exceptions in the CPPFLAGS instead.
>> Best wishes,
More information about the dev-luatex