[NTG-context] Re: Lucida Bright Fonts from StarOffice
patrick at gundla.ch
Mon Aug 23 12:28:28 CEST 2004
Hello Hans and others,
>>>Are these fonts exactly the same as the ones that you buy from
>>I don't know.
> probably not, i once did a project where graphics came from all kind
> of organizations, we ended up with (looking in the final pdf file)
> quite some different lucida clones; the file was a font mess anyway so
> nobody noticed i guess; the same may happen with times and
isn't font and mess a synonym?
These fonts are labelled like:
Comment Generated by Fontographer 4.1 18.02.00 at 15:49
Notice (Copyright \(c\) 1998 Bigelow & Holmes Inc. Pat. Des 289,422.)
> alternatively you can add to your type-loc.tex: \starttypescript
> [serif] [lucida] [ec]
> \definefontsynonym[LucidaBright] [...] [encoding=ec]
> in which case you can probably use the existing lbr definition Hans
I want to avoid name clashes betwenn "lucida from staroffice" and
"official lucida". I have to do some more tests and I'll put the
instructions on the wiki.
ConTeXt wiki: http://contextgarden.net
List archive: http://archive.contextgarden.net
More information about the ntg-context