[NTG-context] No performance improvement under OS X with new beta?
Steffen Wolfrum
context at st.estfiles.de
Fri Mar 4 21:13:40 CET 2005
Matthias Weber <matweber at indiana.edu> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after the recent discussion of ConTeXt processing (some) files 4 times
> as often under OS X
> than elsewhere, I decided to upgrade to the most recent beta and run a
> speed comparison
> on notes I am writing. To my dismay, here are the results:
>
> Old version:
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2004.11.23 fmt: 2004.12.16
> TeXExec 5.2.3
>
> total run time : 324 seconds
>
>
> New version:
>
> ConTeXt ver: 2005.03.02 fmt: 2005.3.4
> total run time : 416 seconds
>
> And I was hoping for a speed increase by a factor of 4 :(
> (I renamed the TeX source for both runs)
As far as I can judge the current version does not yet benefit from
our discussion concerning the runs under OSX.
"ConTeXt ver: 2005.03.02" (pragma site calls it 2005-02-03 [?] 15:19
) doesn't include the changes that Patrick (no more "8 runs") found
out:
sub FlushFiles
{ print TUO "%\n" . "% $Program / Files\n" . "%\n" ;
foreach $File (sort keys %Files)
{ print TUO "% $File ($Files{$File})\n" }
print TUO "%\n" ;
$NOfFiles = keys %Files ;
"texutil.pl" is untouched.
I guess Hans is still verifying this perl hassle?
Steffen
More information about the ntg-context
mailing list