[NTG-context] proposed convention for variation switching [wasRE:inheriting ...

[Taco Hoekwater]

Hi,

> What about:
> light \lf
> medium \mf

if medium is \tf (as it is now),

> semibold \sf
> bold \bf

> lightitalic \li
> italic \it

then italic could be \ti, and all four would be consistent:

  (l|t|s|b)(t|i)

(but I may have missed some reason why this will not work)

Greetings, Taco

> semibold italic \si
> bold italic \bi

> It is more intuitive, is't it?
> 
> I checked if they have not been occupied yet and at least in en 
> interface it is OK.
> 
> vit
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context at ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context