[NTG-context] A TABLE bug (?) from the Wiki.
bmoses at stanford.edu
Sun Sep 4 07:37:23 CEST 2005
The Wiki page on TABLE contains the following example:
\bTR \bTD \eTD \bTD \eTD \bTD \eTD \bTD \eTD \bTD \eTD \bTD \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD[nc=2,nr=2] r1c1 \eTD \bTD r1c3 \eTD \bTD[nr=2] r1c4 \eTD
\bTD[nr=2,nc=2] r1c5 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD[nr=2] r2c3 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD[nc=2] r3c1 \eTD \bTD[nc=2] r3c4 \eTD \bTD r3c6 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD r4c1 \eTD \bTD[nc=2] r4c2 \eTD \bTD[nr=2] r4c4 \eTD \bTD[nc=2]
r4c5 \eTD \eTR
\bTR \bTD[nr=2,nc=2] r5c1 \eTD \bTD[nr=2] r5c3 \eTD \bTD[nr=2,nc=2] r5c5
\bTR \bTD r6c4 \eTD \eTR
This comes with a note: "There is an ugly hack in the code. An empty first
row with zero height and no borders is added. If the row is omitted, then
something odd happens to the number of columns."
Is this an actual bug in ConTeXt, or is it a bug in the example? If the
latter, what's the fix?
More information about the ntg-context