[NTG-context] How to \bf for math?

[Adam Lindsay]

David Munger wrote:
> Very interesting, but with these definitions, I can't get roman
> characters in formulae. For the moment, the best solution for me is
> still the hbox wrapper.

Okay.
What do you mean by "can't get roman characters"? Can you give an 
minimal example?

adam

>> Adam Lindsay wrote:
>>
>>> \startmathcollection[default] %eventual patch for math-tex?
>>> \definemathcharacter [a]   [nothing] [mi] ["61]
>>> \definemathcharacter [b]   [nothing] [mi] ["62]
>>> \definemathcharacter [c]   [nothing] [mi] ["63]
>>> \definemathcharacter [d]   [nothing] [mi] ["64]
>>> \definemathcharacter [e]   [nothing] [mi] ["65]
>> ...
>>
>> Interesting. With these definitions in place, getting mixed bold in cmr 
>> math is a lot better, too...
>>
>> \definetypeface [] [mm] [bfmath] [computer-modern] [computer-modern]
>> \setupformulas [method=bold]
>>
>> \starttext
>> \startformula
>> n({\bfm a} + {\bfm b}) = {\bfm \Gamma}
>> \stopformula
>> \stoptext
>>
>> Now, do digits ever get bold-ed in mixed bold and regular math?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context at ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context


-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept.     atl at comp.lancs.ac.uk
  Lancaster University, InfoLab21        +44(0)1524/510.514
  Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK             Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-