[NTG-context] Table width trouble

Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl
Wed Apr 26 00:11:56 CEST 2006


nico wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:28:20 +0200, Hans Hagen <pragma at wxs.nl> wrote:
>
>   
>> nico wrote:
>>     
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I come back with that damn table test case. With release 2006.04.22:  
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> \long\def\dohandleTBLcellA#1#2[#3]#4%
>>     
>
> Thanks, it does it. Another torture case: when column widths are partially  
> defined, it can give a weird result (here the last column has almost  
> disppeared). Since it's a limit case, I don't know if it's worth being  
> fixed.
>
> \bTABLE[frame=on]
> \setupTABLE[c][2][width=3em]
> \setupTABLE[c][3][width=3em]
> \bTR \bTD[nc=2] A \eTD\bTD x \eTD \bTD[nc=2] B \eTD \eTR
> \bTR \bTD X \eTD \bTD[nc=3] C \eTD \bTD x \eTD \eTR
> \bTR \bTD[nc=2] D \eTD \bTD x \eTD \bTD[nc=2] E \eTD \eTR
> \eTABLE
>   
indeed a strange case 

the best is to collect them so that i can look into them some rainy day 

(btw, if users have interesting example tables that demo something not in ennatab, then we can add them there) 

Hans 


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the ntg-context mailing list