[NTG-context] ONE upright beta, please!
yuleopen at gmail.com
Tue Apr 22 16:22:22 CEST 2008
as far as i am concerned, MKIV is far better than MKII/pdftex, and
have less bugs concerning the internationalization. I use it for
production purpose. I typeset all my essays using luatex, because
pdftex/MKII is messy especially on non-latin typesetting. Yes,
LuaTeX/MKIV had bugs, but Taco and Hans can solve them:) again.
MKII+XeTeX should also produce the right pdf. but I didn't try. (XeTeX
is stable for production, uh?)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Taco Hoekwater <taco at elvenkind.com> wrote:
> Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> > Am 22.04.2008 um 15:50 schrieb Yue Wang:
> >> Use LuaTeX+MKIV..
> > well, sure ... LuaTeX is certainly on my todolist, only not at the end
> > of an almost finished project.
> > I assume LuaTeX is not yet mature enough for real production needs as
> > MKII is, right? Taco?
> No, I do not think that would be wise. Certainly not for a project that
> is nearly finished.
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> maillist : ntg-context at ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
More information about the ntg-context