[NTG-context] MkII vs. MkIV
mbork at atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl
Tue Nov 4 23:18:57 CET 2008
Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(a):
> Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
> > Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer
> > napisał(a):
> >>> Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though,
> >>> that
> >>> the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange
> >>> thing.
> >> You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and
> >> Bogusław
> >> Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming "Full
> >> compatibility means no progress!" at the audience :-)
> > I know that, I read some of the GUST people papers;). I thought,
> > however, that it wouldn't influence my documents *so much*;).
> LuaTeX did not always behave like pdfTeX and if you want the same result
> in your document as in the past, don't switch. The different code for
> MkII and
> MkIV are another reason for different output in a few cases.
Well, since I'm really a beginner, I don't have much ConTeXt documents.
So I guess the sooner I switch, the better - especially that MkIV is
better for my itemizations;).
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)
888 * Nie lękaj się * Ja zawsze będę z Tobą!
More information about the ntg-context