[NTG-context] different behavior between xetex and luatex

Yue Wang yuleopen at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 11:15:34 CET 2008


Hi, Jonathan:


Thanks for the analysis! Now I replace the trk with TRK, and xetex
output is right.

>
> In the LuaTeX case, I don't think *any* ligatures are enabled by default, so
> the language is irrelevant; notice that there's no "ff" ligature in your
> output either, even though this should be expected.


The input file is not right. here is the right one: luatex do not
enable kerning and ligatures by default, users should specify them or
just using the "default" feature. Sorry for the noise.

Yue Wang
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: luatex.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 3192 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20081223/99ffdf41/attachment.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: a.tex
Type: application/x-tex
Size: 1101 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/attachments/20081223/99ffdf41/attachment.tex>


More information about the ntg-context mailing list