[NTG-context] why is \getnumber an undefined control sequence?
schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com
Mon Apr 2 17:15:33 CEST 2012
Am 02.04.2012 um 16:56 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 2-4-2012 16:46, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> what's wrong with this code?
>> \definenumber [testnumber] [way=bytext,prefix=no]
>> A \getnumber[testnumber]
>> Works with older betas, craps out with latest.
> they were already for a while synonyms ... recently all 'structurecounter' names became 'counter' (the structure was a transition addition in order to have old and new code alongside)
> in the process we got rid of the 'number' synonyms
> so, just replace number by counter
The problem are these two synonyms:
\let \getnumber \getcounter % [name]
\let \convertednumber \getcounter % [name]
There is a \convertedcounter but no \getcounter.
@Thomas: You can \rawcounter to print only the numeric value of the counter or \convertedcounter for a formatted form of the counter (you can apply a conversion, e.g. romannumerals or add a prefix, e.g. the current chapter or section number).
More information about the ntg-context